Executive Summary
The re-emergence of the Monroe Doctrine as an active organizing principle of U.S. foreign and economic policy, increasingly described as the “Donroe Doctrine”, represents a structural shift in Western Hemisphere geopolitics. Recent U.S. actions in Venezuela signal a willingness to assert hemispheric dominance operationally, with energy security and resource control at the center of that strategy.
For Canada, the implications extend beyond oil flows. While Canadian crude remains indispensable to U.S. refiners in the near term, the prospective re-entry of Venezuelan heavy crude under U.S. influence restores U.S. optionality and alters Canada’s relative bargaining position. This shift coincides with a period in which Canada’s domestic growth model is evolving, marked by slower population growth, persistent softness in manufacturing employment, and heightened sensitivity of household incomes to external shocks.
Importantly, energy appears to be the first expression of a broader resource strategy, not the last. Similar logic is increasingly visible in U.S. approaches to critical metals, precious metals, and industrial inputs essential to infrastructure, electrification, and national security. As such, Canada’s response will shape not only its oil economics, but its positioning across the next phase of the global real-asset cycle.
Taken together, these dynamics elevate Canada’s strategic response from a foreign policy consideration to a determinant of medium-term economic outcomes and long-run prosperity.
The Modern Monroe Framework and Resource Optionality
The contemporary interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine places renewed emphasis on hemispheric self-sufficiency, supply-chain control, and reduced tolerance for external influence across the full spectrum of strategic commodities in the Americas. While energy markets have been the most visible early application, the framework is increasingly extending to resources that underpin industrial capacity, food and energy security, defense readiness, technological infrastructure, and monetary credibility.
From this perspective, oil is not unique; it is precedent-setting.
The same strategic logic is now being applied across the broader commodity complex, including:
- Base metals such as copper and aluminum, as foundational inputs for electrification, grid expansion, advanced manufacturing, and AI-driven infrastructure
- Critical and strategic minerals, including uranium, potash, lithium, nickel, and rare earths, where concentration risk, processing chokepoints, and geopolitical exposure are acute
- Precious metals, particularly gold and silver, which occupy a dual role as industrial inputs and monetary hedges amid rising sovereign debt and reserve diversification
For markets, the defining shift is not nationalization or exclusion, but optionality. The U.S. is increasingly structuring hemispheric supply chains so that it can substitute between politically aligned sources across energy, metals, fertilizers, and monetary commodities, reducing reliance on external or adversarial jurisdictions.
Canada, by virtue of scale, geological endowment, governance, and proximity, sits at the center of this strategy. But its leverage within it is conditional; shaped not only by what it produces, but by how strategically it chooses to position those resources.
Venezuelan Crude as Template, Not Exception
Venezuela’s oil resource base is among the largest globally and geologically comparable to Canadian oil sands. Years of underinvestment, technical degradation, capital flight, and institutional erosion imply a slow and uneven recovery trajectory, with meaningful output gains requiring sustained external capital, service re-entry, and political continuity. As a result, Venezuelan crude is unlikely to materially displace Canadian supply in the near term, particularly given the deep physical integration between Canadian barrels and U.S. refining infrastructure.
Over the medium term, however, even partial normalization alters market psychology. Incremental Venezuelan barrels restore U.S. choice. The reintroduction of an alternative heavy crude stream places a structural ceiling on Canadian differentials, improves U.S. negotiating leverage, and reinforces the perception that Canadian oil is a strategic preference rather than a structural necessity. In commodity markets, this shift in perception often matters as much as physical flows. Optionality compresses risk premia, reshapes long-term contracting behavior, and influences where capital is ultimately deployed.
This pattern is instructive because it extends well beyond oil. The Venezuelan case represents a broader template for how the U.S. is increasingly approaching all strategic commodities: not by maximizing near-term volumes, but by reconstructing hemispheric supply options that reduce dependence on any single jurisdiction and restore substitution power across the resource complex.
In copper and base metals, U.S. policy is increasingly oriented toward Western Hemisphere sourcing, accelerated permitting, and allied production expansion. The objective is to secure long-duration access to inputs foundational to electrification, grid hardening, defense systems, advanced manufacturing, and AI-driven infrastructure. By broadening supply options across the Americas, the U.S. reduces exposure to extra-hemispheric bottlenecks and strengthens its ability to influence pricing, investment flows, processing capacity, and downstream industrial development.
In silver and specialty metals, which occupy hybrid positions as both monetary and industrial inputs, supply chains are being reassessed through the combined lenses of defense readiness, solar deployment, electronics manufacturing, and secure communications. As their role in energy transition technologies and strategic industries expands, so too does the incentive to anchor production, refining, and inventories within politically aligned jurisdictions.
In gold and monetary commodities, the strategic dimension is more subtle but no less important. Central bank accumulation, reserve diversification, and domestic production support reflect a desire to reduce exposure to external monetary systems while reinforcing financial credibility, collateral strength, and sovereign optionality. Western Hemisphere gold supply therefore increasingly carries both economic and strategic value.
Across each of these markets: energy, base metals, critical minerals, fertilizers, and precious metals; the objective is not lowest-cost sourcing. It is control, reliability, and alignment. The restoration of hemispheric optionality changes how commodities are priced, financed, and governed and, by extension, how much leverage traditional suppliers ultimately retain.
Canada’s Economic Context: Why This Matters More Now
Canada enters this period with a growth profile that is more externally dependent than in prior cycles. Population growth, which supported aggregate demand in recent years, is moderating as immigration targets are recalibrated. Manufacturing employment, particularly in Ontario, continues to face secular pressure from automation, cost differentials, and U.S.-centric industrial policy.
At the same time, productivity growth remains modest, and household balance sheets are increasingly sensitive to income volatility. These factors elevate the importance of resource sectors, not just energy, but metals and mining as anchors of investment, employment, and fiscal capacity.
Canada’s comparative advantage extends well beyond oil:
- Large-scale copper, nickel, and critical mineral deposits
- Established gold and silver mining ecosystems
- Rule-of-law and capital-market depth attractive to long-duration investment
However, as with energy, the value captured from these assets depends on market access, policy alignment, and capital friendliness.
Strategic Alignment: Stability Across the Resource Complex
Under a path of de-facto alignment, Canada positions itself as a reliable hemispheric supplier not just of energy, but across the full spectrum of strategic commodities. Oil and natural gas form the foundation, but the same framework increasingly governs copper, nickel, uranium, potash, gold, silver, and a growing suite of critical minerals. Canada’s resource economy becomes more deeply embedded within a U.S.-anchored production system designed around hemispheric resilience, supply security, and political alignment.
This reinforces Canada’s role within North American infrastructure buildouts, electrification efforts, food and fertilizer security, and defense-oriented supply chains, where reliability, regulatory predictability, and logistical integration take precedence over marginal cost advantages. In effect, Canada functions as a strategic extension of the U.S. industrial and resource base, supplying the physical inputs required for power generation, grid expansion, advanced manufacturing, data-center growth, defense systems, and large-scale infrastructure renewal.
In this framework, Canadian hydrocarbons support power, refining, and petrochemical capacity. Canadian copper, nickel, and critical minerals feed electrification, batteries, and grid hardening. Canadian uranium and potash underpin energy and food security. Canadian gold and silver contribute to both industrial demand and monetary hedging. Capital deployment follows this structure. Investment is directed toward projects that strengthen hemispheric supply chains: pipelines, LNG facilities, power infrastructure, base-metal mines, processing and refining capacity, and transport corridors.
The economic benefit of this path is breadth across the entire commodity complex. Stable capital inflows support not only oil and gas, but also mining, processing, fertilizers, and selective downstream manufacturing. Employment stability improves across Western Canada, Northern Ontario, Quebec, Atlantic Canada, and the North, partially offsetting manufacturing softness in southern Ontario and the economic drag from slowing population growth. Public finances benefit from steady royalty streams, corporate taxes, and infrastructure-related investment, helping stabilize fiscal capacity at both provincial and federal levels.
However, the trade-off remains constrained upside across all commodities. As U.S. optionality expands; through Venezuelan oil normalization, Latin American copper and lithium development, alternative precious-metal supply, and accelerated domestic mining, Canadian pricing power is structurally capped. Canada becomes one high-quality supplier among several within a hemispheric system explicitly designed to ensure substitutability.
The result is stability, but not leverage. Resource revenues support employment and government balance sheets, but Canada’s ability to convert its extraordinary commodity endowment into accelerating real wage growth, improving terms of trade, and rising household prosperity is limited. Over time, this path risks anchoring the Canadian economy in a role defined by dependable volumes and moderate returns, rather than by pricing influence, capital attraction on sovereign terms, or expanding national prosperity.
Strategic Autonomy: Resource Leverage with Higher Volatility
Under a path of strategic autonomy, Canada seeks to re-establish itself not merely as a reliable supplier within a U.S.-anchored system, but as an independent, globally integrated resource power. This approach applies across the full commodity spectrum: energy, base metals, precious metals, fertilizers, uranium, and critical minerals. The central objective is to diversify end-markets, capital sources, processing capacity, and strategic partnerships in order to reduce concentration risk and rebuild national leverage over pricing, investment, and industrial development.
In this framework, hydrocarbons remain foundational, but no longer singular. Oil and natural gas support fiscal revenues and energy security, while copper, nickel, lithium, uranium, potash, gold, and silver become equally strategic pillars. Policy emphasis shifts toward enabling multi-directional export infrastructure, accelerating domestic processing and refining capacity, and cultivating investment relationships across Europe, East Asia, the Middle East, and select emerging markets.
Strategic autonomy implies a more active Canadian posture in shaping its commodity destiny. This includes expanding tidewater access, encouraging domestically anchored smelting, refining, and upgrading, supporting long-duration capital formation, and aligning permitting, tax, and regulatory regimes around competitiveness rather than pure compliance. The objective is not disengagement from the United States, but the restoration of outside options.
The near-term economic profile of this path is less stable. Financing costs may rise as projects depend less on U.S.-anchored offtake and more on global capital markets. Pricing volatility increases as Canadian producers are exposed more directly to international market swings. Execution risk becomes more visible as large-scale infrastructure, mining, and processing projects face longer timelines and higher coordination requirements.
However, over the medium and long term, strategic autonomy improves Canada’s capacity to capture value from structurally tightening commodity markets. In energy, diversified export routes improve realized pricing and reduce differential compression. In copper, silver, and critical minerals, growing global deficits linked to electrification, defense spending, and data-center expansion enhance Canada’s ability to command premium valuations. In gold, rising sovereign accumulation and monetary fragmentation elevate the strategic and financial relevance of domestic production.
In this environment, Canada shifts from being a high-quality volume supplier to a price-relevant participant. Capital formation becomes more endogenous. Rather than responding primarily to U.S. demand signals, Canada increasingly attracts global capital seeking politically stable exposure to scarce real assets. This supports the development of domestic processing, advanced materials, and commodity-linked manufacturing, strengthening productivity and deepening the industrial base.
The employment implications are broader and structurally stronger. Strategic autonomy supports not only extraction, but also engineering, construction, metallurgy, logistics, and downstream manufacturing. Regions historically dependent on single-commodity cycles gain more diversified industrial ecosystems. Over time, this improves income durability, expands high-skill employment, and raises the ceiling on real wage growth.
For public finances, the autonomy path introduces cyclicality but enhances upside. Exposure to global pricing improves the potential for royalty expansion, trade balance improvement, and fiscal capacity growth during commodity upcycles. This supports greater national investment in infrastructure, technology, and human capital, reinforcing long-term prosperity rather than merely stabilizing it.
The strategic risk of this path lies in transition management. Without disciplined execution, Canada faces the possibility of capital flight, policy slippage, or infrastructure bottlenecks. But if successfully implemented, strategic autonomy offers a clearer route toward converting Canada’s exceptional natural endowment into sustained national leverage, stronger household incomes, and a higher long-run growth trajectory.
In contrast to alignment, which prioritizes stability within an external system, strategic autonomy prioritizes optionality within the global system. It accepts higher near-term volatility in exchange for a structurally higher ceiling on Canadian prosperity.
Conclusion: From Geopolitics to Prosperity
The reactivation of the Monroe Doctrine as an operational framework marks a decisive shift in how the United States approaches energy, resources, and hemispheric relationships. What began with oil is increasingly extending across copper, precious metals, fertilizers, uranium, and critical minerals. The strategic objective is consistent: to reconstruct hemispheric supply chains that prioritize control, reliability, and political alignment over pure market efficiency.
For Canada, this shift arrives at a moment of heightened sensitivity. Slower population growth, persistent manufacturing softness, and modest productivity gains have elevated the role of commodities in sustaining national income. As a result, changes in how resource markets are structured now transmit more directly into employment outcomes, fiscal capacity, and household living standards.
The emergence of Venezuelan crude as a U.S. strategic option illustrates this new environment. Its significance lies less in near-term barrels than in what it represents: the restoration of U.S. optionality. That same logic is now being applied across metals and monetary commodities, reshaping the balance of leverage throughout the hemisphere.
Canada’s response is therefore not a narrow energy question. It is a structural economic decision.
A path of de-facto alignment embeds Canada more deeply within a U.S.-anchored system across all major commodities. It offers stability, steady capital inflows, and employment continuity. But it also caps pricing power and constrains Canada’s ability to convert its extraordinary natural endowment into accelerating national income and rising real wages.
A path of strategic autonomy introduces higher near-term volatility and execution risk, but it restores outside options. By diversifying markets, expanding processing capacity, and engaging globally, Canada improves its ability to capture value from tightening resource markets. Over time, this raises the ceiling on investment, productivity, and household prosperity.
The ultimate distinction between these paths is not ideology. It is leverage.
In a world increasingly defined by real-asset scarcity, infrastructure buildouts, and geopolitical fragmentation, nations that retain control over their resource optionality will shape outcomes. Those that do not will absorb them.
For investors, policymakers, and corporate leaders, the central question is no longer whether commodities will matter. It is whether Canada will participate in the coming cycle primarily as a dependable supplier within someone else’s strategic framework or as a price-relevant resource power capable of translating endowment into enduring national prosperity.
About Moneta
Moneta is an investment banking firm that specializes in advising growth stage companies through transformational changes including major transactions such as mergers and acquisitions, private placements, public offerings, obtaining debt, structure optimization, and other capital markets and divestiture / liquidity events. Additionally, and on a selective basis, we support pre-cash-flow companies to fulfill their project finance needs.
We are proud to be a female-founded and led Canadian firm. Our head office is located in Vancouver, and we have presence in Calgary, Edmonton, and Toronto, as well as representation in Europe and the Middle East. Our partners bring decades of experience across a wide variety of sectors which enables us to deliver exceptional results for our clients in realizing their capital markets and strategic goals. Our partners are supported by a team of some of Canada’s most qualified associates, analysts, and admin personnel.